Measuring cognitive ability: all scientific details
01 – the scientific foundation
CHC model
The Cattell–Horn–Carroll model joins the Gf–Gc tradition of Cattell and Horn with Carroll’s three-stratum model into a shared taxonomy of cognitive abilities. It orders cognitive performance hierarchically, from a general ability through broader domains such as fluid reasoning, acquired knowledge, quantitative ability or visual processing, down to specific skills. That structure matters for occupational assessment because cognitive performance is not treated as a vague intelligence label, but assigned to a consistent ability model and interpreted in a differentiated way.
McGrew, K. S. (2009): CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project. Intelligence, 37(1), 1–10.
Foundational publicationTest design
| Framework | CHC model of intelligence |
|---|---|
| Tasks | 42 |
| Duration | about 18 minutes |
| Time limit | Yes, 60 seconds per task |
| Task type | Exactly one correct answer |
| Response format | Multiple choice |
Measurement quality
| Scoring | PercentilePercentile 75: better than 75 percent of the Traitwise reference group. |
|---|---|
| Reference group (norm sample) | 8,222 peopleWorking population and participants in real selection processes, Germany and internationally; the reference group is growing. A shared norm for the German and English versions. |
| Criterion validity | r = .31Relationship with later performance, Sackett et al. (2022). |
| Reliability | Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93Very high internal consistency. |
| Validity | g-factor ≥ 70% of test varianceThe test predominantly measures general problem-solving ability. |
| Objectivity | Standardised administration, automatic scoring |
Sources: Traitwise Assessment Framework; Sackett et al. (2022).
02 – Practical example
Excerpts from the live assessment
Recognise logical relationships, combine and exclude. This is not about specialist knowledge. The task shows how confidently someone links information and draws necessary conclusions.
